Liberal MP Shaun Chen faced accusations of violating House rules after announcing his resignation from the House of Commons on Monday. Allegations surfaced online, suggesting that Chen had cast votes on legislation while in China earlier this year, based on videos shared on WeChat showing his visit to China. The claims, amplified by various right-wing figures and some Conservative MPs, raised concerns about potential breaches of national security.
One post from independent journalist Andy Lee pointed out the coincidence of Chen enjoying ice cream in a video from China on March 25th, the same day records showed he voted six times electronically in the House of Commons. This led to speculations about accessing parliamentary systems from China, a matter of significant concern for national security.
Conservative MP John Barlow also joined the discussion, emphasizing the gravity of the situation and the need for answers regarding Chen’s actions. Referring to House of Commons standing orders, Barlow highlighted the prohibition against MPs voting while outside Canada. Many of the claims revolved around Chen’s alleged vote on Bill C-9, the government’s contentious hate crime legislation, while he was supposedly in China.
In response to the allegations, Chen’s office clarified that the MP had not voted from outside Canada. According to his office, Chen was in China from March 14 to March 22 and returned to Canada for parliamentary duties on March 23. Supporting evidence included Chen’s boarding pass showing his return flight from Taipei to Toronto on March 22, as well as visa stamps in his passport indicating his travel dates.
Chen’s office attributed his resignation to ongoing health issues following a vehicle accident last fall, which limited his ability to travel to Ottawa regularly. The trip to China, sponsored by the Hakka Canadian Association, was part of official parliamentary business with other MPs and senators, aimed at fostering relationships within the Hakka ethnic group in Canada.
The Office of Canada’s Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner disclosed details of Chen’s trip on its website, affirming the legitimacy of the visit. While questions were raised about Chen’s travel choices, the matter shed light on the complexities of parliamentary obligations and personal circumstances affecting MPs’ duties.